Some articles on Thunderbolt 2

Intel : Video Creation Bolts Ahead – Intel’s Thunderbolt™ 2 Doubles Bandwidth, Enabling 4K Video Transfer & Display

AnandTech : Intel’s Thunderbolt 2: Everything You Need to Know

nofilmschool : Intel’s Thunderbolt 2 Now Official, Doubling Bandwidth & Enabling 4K Video Display

Intel Teases 4K Video Transfer, Display with Thunderbolt 2

It’s quite comparable with fiber channel in terms of its technology. They are all based on fiber cable. ( Currently commercially available Thunderbolt is based on copper cables, and Thunderbolt 2 is the same, but originally it was LightPeak by Intel, and the reason they announced it with cooper cable was that they couldn’t find a easy and good interconnection design for consumer market. )

Currently available practical solutions for fiber channel look to be in the range of 8Gb ~ 16Gb.

Then, for Apple, even if they allows the new Mac Pro expansion only through Thunderbolt 2, it’s good enough to support fiber channel speed, because Thunderbolt 2 is up to 20Gbps. However real performance can vary. So, time will tell.

Emulex’s is 16GFC, which is 3200 Mbps == 3.25 Gbps. so, it’s significantly low compared to that of Thunderbolt 2.

Also, when we consider actual performance by considering any manipulation of data by CPU or GPU, we also need to consider interface speed of fiber channel adaptor cards.
Currently PCIe 16 lane speed is :

v1.x: 4 GB/s (40 GT/s)
v2.x: 8 GB/s (80 GT/s)
v3.0: 15.75 GB/s (128 GT/s)
v4.0: 31.51 GB/s (256 GT/s)

So, it’s way faster than Thunderbolt 2.
In Gbps, even the v1.x is 32 Gbps.
So, I wonder if Apple is not to include PCIe slot or any external interface to PCIe for high performance computing market.
I’m pretty sure that any pretty good sized video production business will require PCIe performance. They build their own interface than fiber channel to achieve even faster speed then fiber channel through PCIe. Will Apple give up that market? ( Hmm.. Apple has Final Cut pro which is quite popular in video production market. Oh.. I’ve heard that “video” is kind of word which should not be used in this business, because “video” reminds them of somewhat low quality “movable images”. )

Shouldn’t some one attending at WWDC ask this to Apple engineers and their bosses?

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: